This opinion article was first published on CLUAS in October 2004
CLUAS Opinion
The Muscian's Role
In the 2nd CLUAS Opinion piece,
Californian John Ford - a committed John Kerry supporter - provides a timely
exploration of the importance of rock music and its role in politics, with a
particular focus on the role music is playing in the 2004 American Presidential
election.
I write from California. I spent my 20s in Los Angeles during the Reagan Era,
and it was hell. That administration was supporting death and torture squads in
El Salvador and Nicaragua, The environment was under attack. Far Right nuts were
being nominated to the Federal & Supreme Courts. The national debt was being
doubled and tripled (sounds like deja-vu all over again, huh?). I remember
feeling that it was the first time in our history that the following generation
would not have it better than their parents.
It felt like all music was political then. The local LA punk & club scene was
wild. Lots of inherently political shows by bands like X and the Dead Kennedys
(police helicopters, tear gas, night sticks - those were the days!). The Clash,
for five nights at the Hollywood Paladium, railed against Reaganism /
Thatcherism in the heart of comfortable California.
Springsteen's music & shows
progressed from personal dramas to dark tales of the decline of America, and he
began to include booths for Vietnam Vet organizations and food banks at his
shows. There were the big benefit tours: No Nukes shows, the Amnesty
International tour, anti-apartheid shows, anti-foreign policy (in Central
America) shows, a massive cross-cultural show at the LA Coliseum celebrating the
release of Mandela (he was the closer).
These were great, inspiring times - but President Reagan was re-elected, and was
followed by Bush senior. The horrors of their policies went on.
It's hard to exaggerate the importance of the upcoming US election, both for us
here in America and for the rest of the world. This election matters because the
current U.S. administration is so damned incompetent. They can't get things done
(except for rewarding billionaires and killing poor people). An America that
works with the rest of the world instead of against it will impact everyone.
Throwing out this incompetent crowd of reactionary zealots and voting in Mr.
Kerry's team will lead to less dead bodies at the hands of the U.S. We can start
to rebuild some credibility in the world regarding human rights, the value of
democracy, decreasing worldwide pollution, decreasing oil consumption and our
reliance on tyrannical regimes to supply our oil fix, etc. The world, not just
the U.S., will be a better place with President Bush out and President Kerry in.
For me, this election is all about my kids' future. They are going to be saddled
with enormous national debt, which equates as less opportunity in life. Much
more importantly, if President Bush is re-elected, they will inherit a country
with a weakened constitution (which is everything in America), with maybe four
more neo-Nazi Supreme Court judges, with more racial injustice, with more guns
everywhere, with more 'hooray for me, to hell with you'. They will travel the
world with a target on their back, as the enemy of the little guy. They will
inherit the guilt of America as oppressor. It's not only appropriate for artists
to be in an uproar over this election, it's imperative - and it's almost their
duty.
My take is that folks aren't so much upset at artists trying to influence the
political world; they're upset at rich, spoiled artists trying to tell us real
folks what to think. Also, this time around there are artists pushing for a
partisan candidate, instead of just protesting, in righteous indignation,
against some injustice. It's so much easier to be comfortably "anti-" than to
take a positive stand.
People didn't object so much when relatively poor artists like Odetta, Pete
Seeger or Woody Guthrie took strident political stands about civil rights, World
War 2, or The Depression. Guthrie wrote several partisan songs specifically
promoting F.D.R. and the New Deal.
It's a bit different when spoiled multi-millionaires preach to us about what's
best for the little guy, as they sip their brandy on the yacht. That's why there
is a very short list of pop artists that have the proven integrity to pull it
off. The artists on the Vote For Change
tour have said that they are uncomfortable openly advocating for Senator
Kerry, and don't do so lightly. The stakes have become so high, and the
potential catastrophe of another four years of neo-conservatism so worrisome,
that the partisan plea has become necessary. You don't get to vote against the
status quo; in our system you can only vote for the opposition. A non-vote ("I'm
not political") equals a vote for the bad guys.
One of my favourite artists-taking-a-political-stand stories is when John Lennon
upset the Left and the Right when he sang, in Revolution, about his rejection of
violence and of easy answers in our spirited quest to transform society, this at
the height of the counterculture movement, both hippy-peaceful and
Weather Underground-violent.
That's the artist challenging his audience's assumptions and beliefs - using his
platform to stimulate thought and maybe effect change. He's done his job; the
audience can do what they want with it.
I strongly disagree with the idea that pop artists should just entertain us and
not try to persuade us or 'enlighten' us. That was once the case, but The
Beatles and Bob Dylan changed all that. As did Stevie Wonder and Marvin Gaye,
when they smacked us with 'What's Going On', 'Talking Book', 'Innervisions',
etc. Pop music hasn't been the same since. What would our culture be without The
Clash making us squirm with 'Clampdown', or The
Pistols floating on a barge down the Thames during the Queen's jubilee, howling
'God Save The Queen'? Or Springsteen challenging us to look into ourselves for
hatred, on The Rising tour? Or U2
pleading for peace, love and understanding in Ulster and elsewhere? They're
doing their job as Bob Dylan defines it in 'A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall':
'And I'll tell it and think it and speak it and breathe it,
And reflect it from the mountain so all souls can see it,
Then I'll stand on the ocean until I start sinkin',
But I'll know my song well before I start singin''
The key to all of this is the punk revelation that these artists aren't gods; they are just intelligent people whose opinions we've learned to trust. Consider what they are saying, do your homework, and use your own brain to decide. No one is asking any listener to 'vote as I say', but to get involved and become aware and make an informed choice.
Discuss this article on the CLUAS
discussion board.
Previous CLUAS Opinion pieces...
Dateline: January 2006 | |
|
|
Dateline: December 2005 | |
|
|
What Pop Music Can Teach Us About The Spirit Of Christmas... |
Dateline: December 2005 |
|
|
Dateline: December 2005 | |
|
|
Homosexuality in pop music and the taboos that still surround it... |
Dateline: September 2005 |
|
|
Dateline: June 2005 | |
|
|
Dateline: May 2005 | |
|
|
Dateline: March 2005 | |
|
|
Dateline: February 2005 | |
|
|
Dateline: January 2005 | |
|
|
Dateline: December 2004 | |
|
|
Dateline: November 2004 | |
|
|
Dateline: October 2004 | |
|
|
Dateline: October 2004 | |
Roddy Doyle said recently in an interview in The Guardian that Ireland doesn't produce great musicians. Considering that he is currently promoting a novel centred on Louis Armstrong and American jazz, it's possible that he may have been quoted out of a very broad context. Nonetheless, he has a valid point. Read the full article... |