quote:
Originally posted by nerraw
quote:
Originally posted by vandala
Stupid, sloppy journalism. The journalist seems to think that becoming a "friend" of a "super-group" like Editors actually has some kudos, while obviously it's just a simple matter of adding the friend to your list. And 600 friends? A "devoted fan base"?!!! A 9 year old kid could probably rack up about 1000 in a week if he/she hit enough "friend requests".
Where's the story here? That Alan McGee heard a demo he liked and thus offered the "band" a GIG? I seriously doubt having 600 friends is going to sway somebody like McGee. "Indie band in McGee likes their demo shock!" A demo is still a demo regardless of whether the band Hope Against Hope existed or not.
So just who is this Jonathan Brown and why the hell is he so out of touch? Fooled? 'Tis just foolish.
I think you're missing the point. A band that doesn't exist is able to create so much hype that Alan McGee wants to book them regardless of quality.
That myspace site is s**te with everyone trying to outdo one another with more exotic bands that disappear over the course of a week.
Missing the point? Perhaps. Maybe I'm just being pedantic. I will say this, though:
1) The fact that the band doesn't exist is irrelevant. In as much as a website exists, a demo on the site exists, a photograph exists, and a "fanbase" exists, the band exists. I'm suggesting if McGee heard the demo and thought it was a load of tosh, I seriously doubt he would have put his career on the line by booking a band to play a gig.
2) Having 600 friends in myspace does not constitute being on the verge of stardom.
3)Having Alan McGee book a gig for you does not constitute being on the verge of stardom.
What I'm arguing is this: if "the band" had collected 20,000 fans, scored a major label record deal and a top ten single in the UK charts, and THEN it transpired that they "did not exist", that would be worthy of a story. The newsworthiness of a hoax can only be measured by the impact it makes. This sorry tale's a damp squib.