quote:
Originally posted by Una
best ofs of good bands are going to be good.
Yeah, to an extent, in that they're gonna contain lots of good tracks, but I suppose the difference between a good and a really great compilation is the amount of thought put into it. The Chemical Brothers recent singles collection was a little disappointing for example. The U2 best ofs which were split across 2 releases were a wee bit crap too, neither quite doing a good job of compiling all the hits for new fans or the B-Sides for people who had all their albums. Splitting the releases into Hits and B-Sides/rarities rather then Chronologically would have been better.