quote:
Originally posted by Unicron
I think they're just really into the Neptunes and Timbaland, but Outkast came 1 & 2 and as far as I know they make their own beats.
I'm sorry but I just don't get it. The lists are riddles with inconsistency. Between them, Ghostface and MF Doom have 5 albums in the top 100 but not one mention in the singles list. The same goes for Aesop Rock and Diplo who both got the nod for their albums but had their excellent singles omitted.
I can understand and agree with Pitchfork's obsession with Outkast. I recognise that Eminem and Kanye West are both talented (they still don’t deserve the number of entries they received). I know that the Neptunes and Timbaland are genius's so I can justify the inclusion of their collaborations with mediocre MCs (Missy Elliott and Clipse). I can even swallow the surplus of superior pop from the likes of Justin Timberlake, Kelis, Destiny's Child/Beyonce and Aaliyah. But what’s the story with T.I., Fabolous, Usher, Cam'ron, Jay-Z, Sean Paul, Twista, Nelly, 50 Cent and R Kelly? Their singles are lowest common denominator bullsh*t. If Pitchfork want to be populist they should include Nas or M.O.P. If they're so fond of the Neptunes why did they omit their excellent collaborations with ODB and Snoop Dog. There are some redeeming inclusions such as The Roots and Talib Kweli but for a site that seems to support independent/alternative music their omission of RJD2, Dilated Peoples, DJ Shadow, Mr Lif, Sage Francis, Pharoahe Monch, Atmosphere, J-Live, Buck 65, Jurassic 5, Common, Quasimoto, Blackalicious, Dilated Peoples, Edan, Roots Manuva, Dead Prez and Mos Def is just baffling.
And as for Jay-Z, the emperor has no clothes. I don't care how many five star reviews the Blueprint receives, it's still a patchy album. When he's good he's very good (99 Problems) but most of the time he's sh*t.